Leapsome is a people-enablement suite spanning reviews, OKRs, engagement surveys and learning across the company. Trivo does one small thing well: a fast check-in for a single engineering team. Here's an honest comparison.
Trivo is for
A team-level check-in a leader runs themselves — three numbers, anonymous comments, split detection and an AI summary for the sync. Not a performance or learning platform.
Leapsome is for
A people-enablement platform for HR and managers: performance reviews, goals/OKRs, engagement surveys, learning paths and one-on-ones, across the whole company.
Side by side
| Trivo | Leapsome | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | check Team health before your sync | check Company-wide people enablement |
| What people answer | check 3 sliders + 3 open questions (~2 min) | check Reviews, goals & engagement surveys |
| Built for | check Engineering teams | check HR, People teams & managers |
| Disagreement | check Split detection flags divergence | check Segmentation & analytics |
| AI summary | check AI Insight Report per check-in | check Analytics & recommendations |
| Performance reviews / OKRs | remove Stays a check-in | check |
| Learning / development | remove | check |
| Slack / Microsoft Teams | remove Email links, no chat integration | check |
| Pricing model | check Flat per team (from €29) | check Per employee / seat |
Leapsome is a capable, broader platform — this page compares it with Trivo on the narrow job Trivo is built for. Competitor capabilities described in general terms; check their site for current details.
Where Trivo wins
Three numbers, not forty questions — morale, quality and flow on a 1–9 scale, answered in a couple of minutes so people actually finish.
Built for the team, not the org chart — it runs before your team's sync and hands the team leader concrete, right-sized next steps.
Split detection — it flags when a team's answers pull apart instead of burying the disagreement inside a single average.
An AI Insight Report for every check-in — executive summary, the themes in the comments, and next steps, rewritten as responses come in.
Flat pricing, per team — from €29 a team, not a per-seat bill that climbs every time you hire.
Written feedback goes to the team leader only — company admins see the report, never the raw comments.
Being honest
Trivo does one small thing well. If any of these describe you, Leapsome is the better call.
You want reviews, OKRs, engagement and learning in one company-wide platform.
You need structured development paths and one-on-one tooling for managers.
You have a People team to run review and survey programmes across departments.
You need HRIS, SSO and Slack/Teams integrations — Trivo is email-only and scoped to a team.
Why per-seat pricing doesn't scale
Typical per-seat tool
~€600+ / month
80 users × ~$8/user/month, and it climbs every time you hire.
Trivo — Department plan
€79 / month
Up to 5 teams, 20 members each — flat, whether you're at 40 people or 100.
See the full lineup on the pricing page →
Questions
For a full people-enablement suite — reviews, OKRs, engagement and learning together — Leapsome is a different weight class. Trivo is the alternative when a single engineering team wants a fast, honest read before the sync without an HR programme behind it.
No, and deliberately. Trivo stays a lightweight team check-in on morale, quality and flow. It doesn't do reviews, OKRs or learning paths — so nothing about it feels like a performance tool.
Trivo is a flat monthly price per team, from €29 — not a per-seat people-platform contract. There's a free tier to prove the value on one team first.
Free to start on one team. No 40-question survey, no per-seat bill.
Start for free