Traditional HR surveys kill agile momentum. Trivo gives your team leads a frictionless way to track Morale, Quality, and Flow—without the 40-question corporate interrogation.
How it works
The team leader gives a start date and end date. Everyone on the team gets an email the moment it opens.
Three sliders for morale, quality and flow, and three open questions. A couple of minutes each, once per check-in. No name is ever shown next to an answer.
Morale, quality and flow plotted across 30 or 90 days, so a bad week reads as a bad week and a slide reads as a slide.
An executive summary, the themes running through the comments, and next steps small enough to finish inside one sprint. Why this works →
It's a web app, not a meeting. Nobody has to be in the office or in the room to take part.
Everyone gets a link by email and answers from wherever they work, if it is at home, the office, a different timezone. Distributed and hybrid teams take part exactly the same way, on their own time, in a couple of minutes.
Open the check-in a few days ahead of the retro. By the time the team sits down, the scores, the split flags and the comments are already in so the retro is spent discussing the sprint, not gathering reactions on the spot.
Every check-in rates the same three dimensions on a 1–9 scale. Same questions every time, which is what makes the trend mean something.
"How did you feel overall this period?"
"How satisfied were you with your output?"
"How consistent was your focus?"
1–3 critical · 4–6 moderate · 7–9 healthy
Anonymous feedback
A score tells you something changed. The writing tells you why. Every check-in asks three open questions, and no name is ever shown beside an answer.
Written feedback goes to the team leader and nobody else. Company administrators see the report, never the raw comments.
We ask people to avoid personal identifiers, and we say so in the app. On a very small team, be realistic with your people about what stays unguessable.
What went well?
"Pairing on the migration saved us days. Best week in a while."
What could be improved?
"Three days of the sprint went to unplanned support work. Again."
Action items & next steps
"Rotate a support duty so the rest of us keep a clear runway."
Alignment
One number per dimension smooths everything over. A flow score of 4.8 might mean the whole team landed near five or half of them scored a 2 while the other half scored an 8. The average reads the same either way.
Trivo looks at how far apart the answers sit, not just the middle. When a dimension is split, it flags the disagreement automatically so you walk into the retro knowing where the team doesn't see the sprint the same way.
Flow
4.8
Team average
4.8
Member range
2–8
On average the sprint looked fine but individual scores ran from 2 to 8. That hidden disagreement is the signal worth bringing into the retro.
Two views. One shows you the shape of the last three months, the other tells you what to do on Monday.
The trend view
Morale
6.4
AlignedQuality
7.1
MixedFlow
4.8
SplitThe alignment check is the interesting one. A 4.8 could be a whole team that's mildly unhappy, or half the team fine and half checked out. When individual scores on a dimension are far apart, Trivo flags it as Split, that's usually where the real conversation is.
Underneath the charts, the leader gets every comment from the period with its scores and date attached buth with no name.
What people wrote
"Three days went to unplanned support work again. Pairing on the migration was the one bright spot."
"Priorities shifted mid-sprint twice. Hard to plan around that."
For the retro
The insight report
Every score and every comment from the period goes into one report: an executive summary, the themes running through the writing, a read on each dimension and where it's heading, and concrete next steps.
It rewrites itself as responses come in, so it's current whenever you open it. Print it and take it into the retro.
Included on Pro and Business.
Insight Report
Executive summary
Quality is holding, but flow has dropped for a third period running as unplanned support work keeps displacing committed sprint scope.
Key themes
Metric breakdown
Suggested next steps
Ask the assistant
Every score and every comment from your check-ins is sitting there. The assistant just reads it back to you in a sentence. Ask why flow dropped, what people keep raising, or what to do about it, and get an answer grounded in the actual numbers.
It never invents a figure, and it never names anyone. The written feedback stays anonymous. Just morale, quality and flow on a 1–9 scale, and the themes running through what the team wrote.
Assistant
Platform team
Trust survives on being specific about this, so here it is.
The first agile value
The Agile Manifesto puts people and the conversations between them first, so any tool that inserts itself into that is right to be treated with suspicion. Trivo is built to stay on the right side of that line. It doesn't run your retro or hold the conversation for you. It hands the team one honest signal where morale, quality and flow actually stand, and where you quietly disagree. So the conversation you were already going to have starts from the truth instead of a guess.
Stop guessing what your team needs.
Get the data, then have the conversation.
The Acceleration Era
AI and automation are speeding up every function. Engineering ships faster, sales works more leads, support closes more tickets. None of that measures the human cost, burnout, misalignment, and quality quietly slipping. Trivo keeps that visible wherever your team works, in a sprint, a pipeline, or a queue. So faster doesn't mean fragile.
Not ready yet? Get product updates and new features in your inbox.